If a urinary catheter has been in place for more than two weeks and is still needed, what is the recommended action?

Study for the UF CPP Infectious Diseases Test. Use flashcards and multiple choice questions with hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

If a urinary catheter has been in place for more than two weeks and is still needed, what is the recommended action?

Explanation:
The main idea here is that long-term indwelling urinary catheters accumulate biofilm, crystals, and debris, which increases the risk of blockage and infection as time passes. If a catheter has been in place for more than two weeks and the patient still needs drainage, replacing the catheter now helps restore a clean lumen and reduce these risks. Keeping the same catheter beyond this point makes blockage and catheter-associated infection more likely, so re-establishing a new catheter is the safer choice. Removing it entirely would deprive the patient of necessary urine drainage and could cause urinary retention. Switching to an external catheter isn’t appropriate when the patient requires an indwelling catheter for bladder drainage.

The main idea here is that long-term indwelling urinary catheters accumulate biofilm, crystals, and debris, which increases the risk of blockage and infection as time passes. If a catheter has been in place for more than two weeks and the patient still needs drainage, replacing the catheter now helps restore a clean lumen and reduce these risks. Keeping the same catheter beyond this point makes blockage and catheter-associated infection more likely, so re-establishing a new catheter is the safer choice.

Removing it entirely would deprive the patient of necessary urine drainage and could cause urinary retention. Switching to an external catheter isn’t appropriate when the patient requires an indwelling catheter for bladder drainage.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy